Night at the Museum

Does the student have at least 5 stations?

There are at least five viewing stations which outline the topic the student is covering - each with unique content.

Does the student have relevant audio at each station?

Each viewing station has audio relevant to the content at that station. This could be sound effects, dialogue, narration, etc…

Does the student have at least 3 images on floating planes or embedded in their display stations?

The student uses at least three images or videos between the five stations to help articulate their research topic.

Does the environment the student has created make sense with the content?

The environment thematically matches the presented content, likely in the form of a gallery or museum, but could be a creative setting as long as it is thematically appropriate (for example a forest setting if the student is covering a VR foliage modeling tool)

Is every station reachable and able to be viewed?

The user is able to navigate easily to each station, and has a way to see a clear view of that station's content.

Does the student orient the user with instructions of how to use the app.

The beginning of the experience provides the user with instructions on how to navigate.

Is the content outlined in the experience either about VR companies/applications, or industries that could be impacted by VR and how?

The audio and/or visual content at the stations in the experience is about one or more of the following:
• One or more VR companies.
• One or more VR applications (how VR is used).
• One or more industries that have the potential to be impacted by VR and how.

Between all the stations, does the content showcase a clear overview of the topic?

The content is articulated in an easily understandable manner.

All media renders properly

There are no broken or inaccurate links, pictures, or video in the project write-up.

Does the student have an introduction for their write-up?

The project is clearly introduced at the very beginning of the piece with text and/or media. Tell us what your project is!

Does the student show their finished result in detail?

The final result of the project is clearly shown through media and written about in a clear manner.

Does the student show their process work in their write-up?

The write-up includes evidence of the student's in-progress project (sketches, iterations, screenshots from earlier versions than the final) as either media or text

Does the student showcase user testing and iteration in their write-up?

The write-up includes information about user testing process and/or findings from the user testing, as well as changes made afterwards.

Does the student have a conclusion or next steps section in their write-up?

The write-up includes a section to wrap up, or a next steps section.

Does the write-up have a clearly defined visual structure with a title and section headers?

The write-up has a clearly defined visual structure that is scannable through section headers. Skim the document quickly. You should be able to easily distinguish sections visually either through type hierarchy or visual spacing/dividers. If the student has sections but they are not easily recognizable, they do not meet specifications.

Does the write-up include:
• Two or more screenshots
• Video of final project
• One or more sketches

Student's write-up includes all the required media. Screenshots and video of their final project, sketches of their work, and some additional documentation.

Is the write-up of reasonable length?

If the write-up takes longer than 5-10 minutes to read in it's entirety, it is too long. Similarly, if it takes less than 1-2 minutes to read in it's entirety, it is too short.

Is the project clearly articulated over the course of the write-up?

After having read the write-up, is it clear what the project is, what it does, who it was made for, how it was made, and who made it?